Challenger App

No.1 PSC Learning App

1M+ Downloads
A Court Case Number is written as OP 1/2015. Here OP stands for :

AOpen Petition

BOpposite Party

COther Party

DOriginal Petition

Answer:

D. Original Petition


Related Questions:

Which of the following statements is/are correct regarding the Audit Board under the CAG?

(i) The Audit Board was established in 1968 on the recommendation of the Administrative Reforms Committee.

(ii) The Audit Board consists of five members, including a Chairman, all appointed by the CAG.

Consider the following statements about the CAG’s audit responsibilities:

(i) The CAG audits all receipts of the Centre and states to ensure effective checks on revenue assessment, collection, and allocation.

(ii) The CAG audits the accounts of local bodies only when requested by the President or Governor.

(iii) The CAG’s certificate on the net proceeds of any tax or duty is final, as per Article 279.

(iv) The CAG submits audit reports on state accounts directly to the state legislature.

Which of these statement(s) is/are correct?

Consider the following statements about the State Finance Commission’s powers:

  1. The Commission can requisition public records from any office.

  2. The Commission determines the taxes that panchayats can levy and expend.

  3. The Commission’s members are appointed by the President of India.

Choose the correct statement(s) regarding the Inter-State Council and Zonal Councils.

  1. The Inter-State Council was established under Article 263 of the Constitution based on the recommendations of the Sarkaria Commission.

  2. The Zonal Councils are constitutional bodies established under Article 263 to promote cooperation between states and the Centre.

  3. The North-Eastern Council was created under the States Reorganisation Act of 1956.

Which of the following statements are correct about the Chandra Kumar case (1997)?

i. It declared the exclusion of High Court jurisdiction under Articles 323A and 323B unconstitutional.

ii. It allowed appeals against CAT orders to be made to the Division Bench of the concerned High Court.

iii. It upheld the restriction that appeals against CAT orders could only be made to the Supreme Court.

iv. It emphasized that judicial review is part of the basic structure of the Constitution.

v. It ruled that SATs cannot exercise original jurisdiction over state government employees.