Question:

Which among the following statements is/are not correct with regard to the advisory Jurisdiction of Supreme Court of India?

1. The President can refer a question of law or fact of public importance to the Supreme Court of India.

2. The Supreme Court is bound to give its observation in the matter

3. The President is bound by the opinion of Supreme Court.

4. The judge who does not concur may deliver a dissenting judgement

A1 only

B1 and 2 only

C2 and 3 only

DAll are true

Answer:

C. 2 and 3 only

Explanation:

The Supreme Court has advisory jurisdiction over matters that have been specifically referred to it by the President of India under Article 143 of the Constitution. The advisory jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in Article 143 gives the President the power to make references to the SC on any matters but it can’t be called the Jurisdiction of Supreme Court. The views taken by the Court are not binding on the President and it is not law within Article 141. It is on the Court to examine if it should be answered or not, if not then with valid reasons.


Related Questions:

Article 29 of the Constitution of India grants which of the following rights?

Which statement is NOT correct regarding the tenure of judges of the Supreme Court ?

The original constitution of 1950 envisaged a Supreme Court with a Chief Justice and 7 other Judges. As the work of the Court increasedand arrears of cases began to cumulate, Parliament increased the number of Judges several times since 1950. What is the total number of judges in Supreme Court?

The feature "power of Judicial review" is borrowed from which of the following country

സുപ്രീം കോടതിയിലെ ആദ്യ വനിതാ ജഡ്ജി ആരായിരുന്നു ?