Challenger App

No.1 PSC Learning App

1M+ Downloads

Which among the following statements is/are not correct with regard to the advisory Jurisdiction of Supreme Court of India?

1. The President can refer a question of law or fact of public importance to the Supreme Court of India.

2. The Supreme Court is bound to give its observation in the matter

3. The President is bound by the opinion of Supreme Court.

4. The judge who does not concur may deliver a dissenting judgement

A1 only

B1 and 2 only

C2 and 3 only

DAll are true

Answer:

C. 2 and 3 only

Read Explanation:

The Supreme Court has advisory jurisdiction over matters that have been specifically referred to it by the President of India under Article 143 of the Constitution. The advisory jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in Article 143 gives the President the power to make references to the SC on any matters but it can’t be called the Jurisdiction of Supreme Court. The views taken by the Court are not binding on the President and it is not law within Article 141. It is on the Court to examine if it should be answered or not, if not then with valid reasons.


Related Questions:

Which of the following statements related to Judicial review in India is true?

  1. The process of judicial review in India involves the evaluation and annulment of Executive or Legislative actions that are incompatible with the Constitution and Human Rights.
  2. The Supreme Court and the High Courts have the authority to invalidate any law that contradicts the provisions of the Constitution.
  3. The process of judicial review serves as one of the checks and balances in the separation of powers, ensuring the supremacy of the Constitution.
    ഇന്ത്യൻ പ്രസിഡൻ്റിന് സത്യവാചകം ചൊല്ലി കൊടുക്കുന്നത് ആര് ?
    The final interpreter of the Constitution of India
    ആമുഖം ഭരണഘടനയുടെ ഭാഗമല്ലെന്ന് സുപ്രീംകോടതി വിധിച്ച കേസ്?
    Who holds the authority to alter the Supreme Court's jurisdiction in India?